<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about $80/hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about $20 per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about $80/hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about $20 per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Your Reaction to Reform; Obama&#8217;s Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureformerAnesthesiologist</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureformerAnesthesiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#039;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &quot;save money&quot; by paying less to the &quot;greedy&quot; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#039;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &quot;reimbursement&quot; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#039;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#039;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#039;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#039;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#039;ll have insurance, you just won&#039;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#039;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#039;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same tactic used to win the election again.  Gain support from the many, who have less and take from those who have more.  He got support of primary care docs, ie the AMA and pitted them against the relatively few who chose long difficult residencies, high stress, odd hour, high liability exposure medical careers (Surgeons, Anesthesiologists etc).  We&#8217;re going to fix this all by giving primary care folks more income and &#8220;save money&#8221; by paying less to the &#8220;greedy&#8221; specialists, who drive up costs, and, by the way, taxing the crap out of their income they have.  Well, as someone who spent many extra years of training and now sweats through long complicated surgeries on the sick elderly for about /hour, I&#8217;m soon done.  Yes, the rate of &#8220;reimbursement&#8221; for Medicare is about  per unit (15 minutes of time).  Anesthesiologists got royally screwed when they calculated the relative value scale, and even the Government admits it.  Most specialties collect 80-90% of insurance rates for Medicare patients, we get about 33%.  My income has stagnated or gone down in the last 15 years while the cost of living here has skyrocketed.  I can no longer affort my mortgage payment, in addition to college tuition.  I pulled my other kids from private schools (thank God we have good public schools here) and we essentially quit the country club.  We can&#8217;t afford a vacation this year.  So someone please tell me why I&#8217;m still staying up all night taking care of laboring patients, busting my ass to keep old sick people alive while they have their hips replaced?  My family and I no longer can enjoy any of the benefits I thought I secured while spending my 20&#8242;s studying and working while all my friends played.  When I am forced to sell this house (the value of which just got crushed), I&#8217;m done in Medicine. Yeah, you&#8217;ll have insurance, you just won&#8217;t have the quality people you have now taking care of you. Have your primary care doctor or Michael Jackson&#8217;s doctor push your Propofol.  I&#8217;ll be working on a dive boat in the Caribbean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick M Pevow, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &quot;everyone&quot;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic healthcare such as immunizations, preventive medicine, diagnosis and medical treatment of diabetes, hypertension and numerous other diseases should be a right of all our citizens and could easily be paid for without a huge increase in federal debt. However, advanced medical treatment such as transplants, coronary by-pass surgery and many others is simply too expensive for society to provide free for &#8220;everyone&#8221;. The sooner we establish a two-tiered system of care, the sooner we can bring rationality back to medical care. Rationing may be a bad word now but better that physicians do the rationing than let politicians make the choices based on political contributions, getting out the vote, nepotism and bribery.<br />
Another fact of healthcare is that practicing physicians have almost no voice in medical education. Medical schools are run by  insulated academic specialists who indoctrinate students in expensive secondary and tertiary care but abandon the basics such as cleaning ears, physical examination, stopping nosebleeds and treating colds. Little wonder that we have to import primary care doctors from abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes there are a lot of great plans on this site, but interestingly, there are no MDs at the table helping to formulate plans about healthcare, I guess we are not needed when the objective is to lower cost, lower quality of care, designate new taxes and bankrupt private insurance.  They have a better track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-641</guid>
		<description>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &quot;class&quot; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#039;s plan. I don&#039;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>believe it or not there are MDs out there in favor of these plans.  I find it saddening.   Obama is trying to generate a type of &#8220;class&#8221; warfare among MDs to support his plan, getting the primary cares to become hateful of specialists who earn more, to earn support when he cuts their reimbursement.  But not far behind that are the cuts to primary care,(the majority of physicians and where money is spent).  The head of the AMA already make a 180 degree turn in favor of Obama&#8217;s plan. I don&#8217;t know who greased his wheels, but its obvious what happened. We need leader of physician organizations who represent us, not slimy backpedaling hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-633</guid>
		<description>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs - get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#039;t get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site needs to limit the number of characters permitted in the comment section. For those writers whose passion requires more than two paragraphs &#8211; get politically active and be part of the change, ranting on a website won&#8217;t get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. czarnecki md</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>n. czarnecki md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned that the major networks will not carry comments in response to the Obama healthcare proposal.  I suggest that we all boycott the mainstream media stations, notify and boycott their advertisers and be certain to let them know that we are displeased with their unjournalistic, one-sided coverage of this matter which affects the entire populice.  Once it passes, there will not be any recourse or turning back.  We must be called to action and not just complain and be led as lambs to the demise of a wonderful healthcare system that may require some minor tweaking to make even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Obama he can see the patients himself. I quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karola F. White, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Karola F. White, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-566</guid>
		<description>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.

I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. 

I would sign up for it.

Karola F. White, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in answer to Dr. Jean-Pierre Forage M.D.</p>
<p>I like your plan, it is simple, no new bureaucracy required to run it and we can help these patients, the earlier the better. </p>
<p>I would sign up for it.</p>
<p>Karola F. White, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &quot;Medicine for the rich&quot; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.

It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &quot;Zoloft&quot; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &quot;other than psychiatric&quot; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#039;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &quot;unless&quot; the patient has had &quot;severe&quot;, meaning &quot;hospitalization required&quot; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &quot;prove&quot; that the patient can&#039;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &quot;preferred&quot; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#039;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#039;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &quot;not meet&quot; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &quot;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#039;t pay for it&quot;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &quot;medicate more aggressively&quot; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#039;s as far as I know. 
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &quot;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &quot;contraindication in this patient&quot; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &quot;cardiologic&quot; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#039;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them. 
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#039;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. 

At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:

12 hour work days, 6 days a week, 
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#039;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening. 
Missing out on life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a one MD child psychiatric practice in urban area, now 4 1/2 years out of Residency and after almost 2 years working in the hospital now in private practice. My experience is that the cost of running my business is rising, while the reimbursements are falling and soon Psychiatry as a whole will be &#8220;Medicine for the rich&#8221; only. I believe in the old fashioned medication and therapy approach, which is proving to be very effective to get patients better and keep them to stay healthy, but a tightrope dance between paying my bills and bankruptcy. I see 85 % military families due to feeling strongly about supporting our troops and their families. This is not easy. I already had to give up all Medicaid patients, after I incurred more debt than I got reimbursed, which I am struggling to pay off at this time.</p>
<p>It all summons up that the way to save money in medical care is to hold patients responsible for their health, instead of taking health for granted. Patients that have an interest in their health seem to listen better, follow instructions and come to appointments to prevent problems instead of waiting until there is a crisis. Life insurances have different rates for smokers and non-smokers, high risk takers and low risk people and give benefits for healthy lifestyles. If insurance companies would reward non-smokers, healthy lifestyles and people who get regular checkups it would save money. In psychiatry specifically, having the ability to go and see a psychiatrist prevents suicide, alcohol and drug abuse and chronic health and mental problems due to psychiatric illness of any kind. Blue Cross Blue Shield does not even allow psychiatric care any more and I have to specify that the medication &#8220;Zoloft&#8221; (a very effective antidepressant and anxiety medication) is used for &#8220;other than psychiatric&#8221; reason for my patient to have it reimbursed to him from BCBS (I don&#8217;t know the branch, specific policy or particular state this patient has it through). Tricare will not allow brand name medication &#8220;unless&#8221; the patient has had &#8220;severe&#8221;, meaning &#8220;hospitalization required&#8221; side effects to the generic, and even then they requested a retrial on generic Lamictal, after the patient ended up in ICU with Stevens Johnson Syndrome. The cost associated with ICU stay to &#8220;prove&#8221; that the patient can&#8217;t tolerate this medication is huge. The 8 year old girl with ADHD, doing well on generic Focalin, having to be exposed to a different medication with all the risks involved, because the generic Focalin is  not available in the US (due to pharmaceutical not making it) and the Insurance refusing to give her the brand name to save money. These are all wastes of money and risks to patients that are simply not needed. Many patients who have to be exposed to numerous &#8220;preferred&#8221; medications, before they will be allowed to get what works with least risk and no side effects, due to the insurance companies dictating what the patient has to take, unless I take the time for the inevitable 45-80 minute phone call to the insurance company to explain why this is my medical decision, with most of the time is rewarded with the patient getting the medication I deem most effective with the least risk to the patient. But taking 80 minutes out of my day, cost the patients and me, not the insurance companies, who only stand to save money, because physicians can&#8217;t afford to do this. Nothing I can do about it, I tried.<br />
Other factors contributing to the high cost of health care as I see it.<br />
0. Showing up for appointments is not mandatory and too many patients see it as not needed and then call in crisis, need to go to ER with preventable events, if they simply followed up as scheduled. Aside the fact that it does cost me money, because of not getting paid if the patient is not showing up, and I am not allowed by the insurance company to bill the patient. The cost for ER visits, hospitalizations, needing to restart medications that have run out needlessly are staggering.<br />
1. College and Medical School are very expensive, starting to make money in your 30&#8242;s with $ 100 K to 200 K in debt that needs to be paid off increases the amount of money a physician has to make to be able to afford a family.<br />
2. While I worked in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry I saw many times that kids were admitted for ONE day and the insurance companies told me (the very next day) that the kid did &#8220;not meet&#8221; their criteria for being in the hospital and the phrase of &#8220;well doctor, we are not telling  you to discharge the kid, we just won&#8217;t pay for it&#8221;, became routine, which is a reason why I quit. Also that insurance companies told me personally that unless I &#8220;medicate more aggressively&#8221; they would not pay for the stay and that insurance companies demanded daily face to face telephone contacts with their own doctors (of any specialty) to justify why they should continue to pay for the stay. Uninsured patients were seen for free by the MD, except that I am carrying the full responsibility for them for at least 21 years concerning malpractice. Finding out that the government reimburses the hospitals for uninsured patients seen and cared for, which never was passed down or shared with any of the MD&#8217;s as far as I know.<br />
Only one insurance company allows RTC (Residential Treatment Center) stay, which in more than one case has helped so much, that no further hospitalizations or ER visits were needed and the kids and their families are thriving. The on call required to work in the hospital was excessive and totally unpaid, while the hospital profits from the ER visits with high charges and the physician having to be available for between 48 hrs and 7 days non-stop, ignoring the deleterious effect this has on patient care. During my time in the hospital three kids, ages 9-15 ended completing suicide, because after discharge they were not able to continue being seen by a psychiatrist, because of the lousy reimbursements, they could not find a provider, or because the family fell through the cracks. A simple follow up would have saved all three lives.<br />
In my city of 2 million, Medicaid patients will not find psychiatric care as required, because these patients have the highest no-show rates and the reimbursements are too low to afford carrying these patients. In addition Medicaid takes up to a year of clean claims being submitted, re-submitted and kept track off that I had to chose between hiring a full time staff to get Medicaid to pay or let go of the patients. I love many of them and regret having to let them go. The quarterly letters by Medicaid to safe money under the &#8220;let-us-help-you-care-for-your-patients- pretense accusing me of malpractice by prescribing whichever medication they are trying to safe money on did not help either. Especially since these accusations of inappropriate prescribing is based on pharmacy records only, and no request from me, to please enlighten me on a &#8220;contraindication in this patient&#8221; has ever been answered. EG the teenager, who Medicaid claimed had a cardiologic reason to not be on Adderall, neither the teen, nor his family, nor my records reflected any &#8220;cardiologic&#8221; anything. Or the schizophrenic teenager, who lives with the delusion of being pregnant, with Medicaid simply accusing me of prescribing antipsychotic to a pregnant teenager. With Medicaid demanding medication changes every three months, which can&#8217;t be cost effective, with the patients being exposed to more medications, more relapses, more impairment and more hospitalizations needed to stabilize them.<br />
3. In private practice, the cost are increasing, because I need to have staff to keep up with the insurance companies (2) that I am still taking, and this is difficult, since clean claims constantly get refused, because of insurance internal problems, because of the amount of calling involved to follow up with the insurance company, because of the paperwork required to get authorizations, which lately have been refused, even though given less than a week ago, causing me to have to pay overtime to my staff, which is not reimbursed. The reimbursements are not keeping up with increased cost of running the business, not even to break even from one year to another. I am more and more struggling and having to see more patients to make the same money as last year. I can&#8217;t afford the electronic billing and record keeping demanded by the government, however much I agree with the benefits they can provide. I looked into it, but the cost is undo able for a one MD place with no corporate financial cushion. </p>
<p>At this time giving my patient the health care they deserve and that I see working well with minimal hospitalizations needed and patients getting better with least amount of medications is costing me:</p>
<p>12 hour work days, 6 days a week,<br />
24/7/365 having to be available for call/emergencies (all call care is not reimbursed by insurances and can&#8217;t be charged to the patient per insurance demands, but serve to keep patients well and out of the hospital, which saves the insurance money. It also saves money to keep patients on smallest amount of medications and teaching them the life skills that they need to keep themselves healthy, which is also not reimbursed by insurances. This is also not reimbursed, because you can only charge one event per day or two per week and the sicker a patient is, the more often they need to be seen to prevent bad things from happening.<br />
Missing out on life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.McGraw,D.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.physiciansnews.com/2009/06/15/your-reaction-to-reform-obamas-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>T.McGraw,D.O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.physiciansnews.com/?p=2455#comment-563</guid>
		<description>Physicians must remove the cloak of complacency.             T.McG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physicians must remove the cloak of complacency.             T.McG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

