Headline »

08/25/2014 – 11:36 PM |

Have you ever wondered why elementary school students — who are awake and watching television by 6AM — don’t start school until 8:45AM while their …

Read the full story »
Business & Law
Finance
Patients
Law & Politics
Technology
Home » News Briefs

Which is Better for Docs? Private practice ownership…or hospital employee?

Submitted by on 03/15/2012 – 2:11 PM One Comment

The Wall Street Journal today presented a profile of a private family medicine practice in Denver and the reasons it struggles to profit.  The Westminster Medical Clinic is doing all of the things policy makers advocate: electronic medical records, coordinating patient care, served as a model for a medical home project, e-prescribing, etc.

With all of its efforts to improve patient care and run a modern practice, the clinic is barely in the black.  Last year, revenues for the five-doc practice were $2,115,501.  Expenses were $2,086,240.  That’s a profit of only $29,261. Is it worth it?  The hours; the paperwork; the staffing; the insurance companies…? Or is it better to be a hospital employee?

One Comment »

  • Rakesh Madan says:

    If Doctors outsource their billing to a revenue specialists they don;t need to be hospitals employees.Because some billing companies take care of doctorscomplete renenue cycle include electronic claims,Patient Payments,Long term recievable,Code rite,Audit gaurd which increase doctor’s revenue by 30% and reduce their cost of billing by 30%.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also Comments Feed via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> 

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.